The Ultimate Guide to Understanding the Hockey Wildcard Rule - Ice Hockey Central (2024)

Welcome to The Ultimate Guide for understanding the Hockey Wildcard Rule. If you are an avid hockey fan, you might have heard the term wildcard being used frequently during the regular season of the NHL. It’s a rule that determines which teams qualify for the playoffs and which teams don’t. While it may seem straightforward, the wildcard rule has its own intricacies that can confuse even the most knowledgeable hockey enthusiasts.

In this comprehensive guide, we will break down everything you need to know about the hockey wildcard rule. From its origin to how it works in the current NHL season, we have got you covered. We will also discuss the pros and cons of the wildcard rule and how it affects the NHL standings. Additionally, we will look at some memorable moments in NHL history that involve the wildcard rule.

So, whether you are a casual fan or a seasoned veteran, buckle up and join us on this journey to gain a better understanding of the wildcard rule and its impact on the game of hockey.

What is the Wildcard Rule in Hockey?

Simply put, the wildcard rule in hockey is a post-season format that allows teams outside the top three in their division to compete for a playoff spot. In other words, it gives teams that barely missed the playoffs another chance to make it to the post-season.

The Wildcard system was introduced to the National Hockey League (NHL) in the 2013-2014 season as part of its realignment. The goal was to create a more geographically friendly format and give more teams a chance to make the playoffs.

Under the Wildcard system, the top three teams from each division automatically qualify for the playoffs. However, the final two spots in each conference are filled by the two remaining teams with the highest point totals, regardless of their division. This means that a team from one division could knock out a team from another division to secure a playoff spot.

While the Wildcard rule has been met with some criticism, it has also created some exciting moments in the NHL playoffs. It gives fans a reason to follow not only their own team but also teams outside of their division.

Understanding the Basics of the NHL’s Wildcard Playoff System

For many years, the National Hockey League (NHL) playoffs were a straightforward affair. The top four teams from each of the four divisions qualified for the postseason, with the top-seeded team facing the fourth-seeded team and the second-seeded team facing the third-seeded team in each division. However, the introduction of the wildcard playoff system has changed the way the playoffs work in the NHL.

The wildcard playoff system was introduced in the 2013-2014 season as a way to increase the number of teams that make the playoffs and to make the race for playoff spots more exciting. Under this system, the top three teams from each division automatically qualify for the playoffs, and the remaining two playoff spots in each conference are awarded to the two teams with the highest point totals that did not qualify automatically.

One of the benefits of the wildcard playoff system is that it creates more meaningful games towards the end of the regular season. With more teams vying for playoff spots, every game counts, and fans are treated to exciting matchups with high stakes. The system also ensures that the best teams make the playoffs, regardless of which division they are in.

However, the wildcard playoff system is not without its critics. Some argue that it dilutes the importance of divisional play and creates potential logistical challenges for playoff scheduling. Others feel that it can be unfair to teams that have strong regular seasons but are edged out of the playoffs by teams with weaker records.

Overall, the wildcard playoff system has brought new excitement and intrigue to the NHL playoffs, while also sparking debate among fans and analysts. Whether you love it or hate it, there’s no denying that the wildcard system has changed the way the NHL postseason works.

How Does the Wildcard Rule Work?

The NHL wildcard rule is a unique playoff format that allows teams to make it into the postseason even if they don’t finish in the top three in their division. The wildcard rule applies to the top two non-division winners in each conference, who are then seeded as the fourth and fifth playoff teams in the conference.

The wildcard teams are determined based on the number of points they accumulate during the regular season. The team with the most points in each conference that didn’t finish in the top three of its division earns the first wildcard spot, while the team with the second most points earns the second wildcard spot.

Once the wildcard teams are determined, they are matched up against the division winner with the best record in the conference. The second and third place teams in the division are matched up against each other in the first round of the playoffs.

The wildcard teams have to play the division winner with the best record, regardless of the number of points they accumulated during the regular season. This means that a wildcard team could potentially finish with more points than a division winner and still have to play them in the first round of the playoffs.

Overall, the wildcard rule adds excitement to the NHL playoffs by giving more teams a chance to compete for the Stanley Cup. It also rewards teams that may have had a slow start to the season but were able to turn things around and earn a wildcard spot.

Determining Wildcard Teams

The NHL’s Wildcard Rule is designed to give teams that did not finish in the top three spots in their division a chance to make the playoffs. But how are these wildcard teams determined?

Firstly, the top three teams in each division automatically qualify for the playoffs. Then, the remaining two playoff spots in each conference are given to the two teams with the highest point totals who did not qualify automatically as one of the top three teams in their division. These two teams are known as the wildcard teams.

It’s important to note that the wildcard teams are not necessarily from the same division. In fact, it’s possible for both wildcard teams to come from the same division, meaning that only three teams from that division would make the playoffs.

So, how are ties broken between teams vying for a wildcard spot? The first tiebreaker is the total number of wins. If the teams are still tied, then the next tiebreaker is the total number of regulation and overtime wins (ROW). If the teams are still tied after that, the tie is broken by the head-to-head record between the teams during the regular season.

Matchups in the First Round of the Playoffs

Once the wildcard teams are determined, they are then matched up with the top two teams in each division for the first round of the playoffs.

Matchups are determined based on seeding. The team with the best record in the conference plays the wildcard team with the worst record, while the team with the second-best record in the conference plays the other wildcard team.

The playoff series between the wildcard team and division winner follows the traditional playoff format, with the best-of-seven series consisting of alternating home games. The division winner with the better record earns the home-ice advantage in the series.

The wildcard team has the opportunity to advance to the second round of the playoffs by defeating one of the top teams in their division, providing an exciting opportunity for underdogs to upset higher-ranked opponents.

While the Wildcard Rule has been a beneficial addition to the NHL playoffs, it has also raised some questions about potential changes to divisional alignment. One possible impact of the Wildcard Rule is the potential for teams from the same division to face each other in the first round of the playoffs.

Under the current system, the top three teams from each division automatically make the playoffs, with the remaining two spots going to the teams with the highest point totals in each conference. If the Wildcard Rule were to be eliminated, it’s possible that the NHL could consider realigning the divisions to ensure that teams from the same division don’t face each other in the first round.

On the other hand, some argue that divisional rivalries add to the excitement of the playoffs and that teams should earn their way to the later rounds, regardless of who they face. Ultimately, any potential changes to divisional alignment would have to be carefully considered to ensure the integrity of the playoffs while also providing a fair and exciting experience for fans.

Regardless of any potential impact on divisional alignment, the Wildcard Rule has brought a new level of excitement to the NHL playoffs and has provided more opportunities for teams to earn a spot in the postseason. As the league continues to evolve and grow, it will be interesting to see how the Wildcard Rule and other changes impact the game of hockey.

The Pros and Cons of the Wildcard Rule

Pros: One of the main advantages of the wildcard rule is that it increases the number of teams that have a chance to make the playoffs. This can lead to more excitement and competitiveness throughout the regular season, as more teams are fighting for a playoff spot. It also allows for some potentially interesting matchups in the first round of the playoffs, as wildcard teams may have to face off against top-seeded divisional rivals.

Cons: One potential drawback of the wildcard rule is that it can result in teams with inferior records making the playoffs, while better teams are left out. This can lead to a perceived lack of fairness and legitimacy in the playoff system. Additionally, the wildcard rule can sometimes result in long travel distances for teams in the first round of the playoffs, as teams from different divisions may be matched up against each other.

Overall: The wildcard rule is a somewhat controversial addition to the NHL playoff system, but it does offer some clear benefits in terms of increasing competitiveness and excitement. However, there are also potential downsides to consider, particularly in terms of fairness and logistics. Ultimately, whether or not the wildcard rule is viewed as a positive change likely depends on personal preferences and priorities when it comes to the sport of hockey.

Final Thoughts: As the NHL continues to evolve and adapt to changing circ*mstances, it’s possible that the wildcard rule could be modified or even eliminated in the future. However, for the time being, it remains an important part of the league’s playoff system and an intriguing factor to consider for fans and analysts alike.

Advantages of the Wildcard System

Increased Competition: The wildcard rule has increased the level of competition among teams as it allows more teams to have a chance at making the playoffs.

More Exciting Playoff Races: With more teams in the playoff race, the wildcard system has made the end of the regular season more exciting as teams battle for playoff spots.

Geographical Diversity: The wildcard system allows for a more diverse playoff bracket as it ensures that the best teams from each division are represented, regardless of geography.

Financial Benefits: The wildcard system has been financially beneficial for the NHL as it has increased revenue through additional playoff games and the heightened interest in the playoff race.

Disadvantages of the Wildcard System

Decreases importance of divisional play: In the past, teams would compete hard within their division, knowing that a division title would guarantee them a playoff spot. However, with the wildcard rule, a team could finish fourth in their division but still make the playoffs, potentially making divisional games less important.

Potential for uneven playoff matchups: The wildcard rule allows for the possibility of an uneven matchup in the playoffs. For example, a team with a better record may have to face a wildcard team with a worse record in the first round, potentially giving the wildcard team an easier path to the next round.

Reduces competitiveness in the regular season: With more teams making the playoffs, there is less pressure on teams to perform well in the regular season. Teams may be less motivated to fight for a higher seed or to win their division, potentially leading to less competitive games.

Can create travel issues: With the wildcard system, it’s possible for teams in the same division to play each other in the first round, leading to increased travel time and potential fatigue for the teams.

Criticisms and Controversies of the Wildcard Rule

Inequality: One of the main criticisms of the wildcard system is that it can create an unfair advantage for teams in weaker divisions, as they may have an easier path to the playoffs than teams in stronger divisions. This can lead to teams with worse records making the playoffs, while teams with better records miss out.

Reduced Importance of Winning Divisions: The wildcard system can also reduce the importance of winning a division, as a team can still make the playoffs even if they don’t win their division. This can lead to situations where a team with a worse record than a division winner gets a higher seed in the playoffs.

Less Exciting Playoff Matchups: Some argue that the wildcard system can lead to less exciting playoff matchups, as wildcard teams may not have earned their spot in the playoffs as much as division winners. This can lead to lopsided games and less interest from fans.

The Impact of the Wildcard Rule on the NHL Standings

Increased Competition: The wildcard rule has increased the competition among teams vying for a playoff spot. The added incentive to secure a wildcard spot has led to more exciting games and tighter playoff races.

More Inclusion: The wildcard rule has given more teams a chance to make the playoffs, which has increased fan interest in the league. Even teams that are out of the divisional race have a chance to qualify for the playoffs through the wildcard system.

New Strategies: The wildcard system has led to new strategies for teams in terms of roster management and player development. Some teams may opt to focus on securing a wildcard spot rather than trying to win their division, which could impact their decision-making throughout the season.

Potential Unfairness: The wildcard system may result in some teams with more points missing the playoffs, while teams with fewer points qualify due to the system’s divisional alignment. This could lead to questions of fairness and could potentially impact the league’s credibility.

Effect on Divisional Races

• Increased competition: The wildcard rule has intensified competition among teams within divisions, as more teams have a chance to make the playoffs. This has led to more exciting divisional races and increased interest from fans.

• Greater importance of divisional games: With the wildcard rule, divisional games carry more weight as they have a greater impact on the standings. This has led to more intense and physical games, as teams battle to secure their spot in the playoffs.

• Impact on playoff matchups: The wildcard teams are assigned to play the divisional champions in the first round of the playoffs, which can lead to some interesting matchups. This adds to the excitement of the playoffs, as fans get to see new and unexpected matchups.

• Impact on divisional rivalries: The wildcard rule has the potential to impact traditional divisional rivalries. Some fans feel that the new playoff format takes away from the importance of these rivalries, as teams are no longer guaranteed to play each other in the playoffs.

Impact on Teams in Strong Divisions

Increased Difficulty: Teams in strong divisions have to compete against tougher opponents throughout the season, which makes it more difficult for them to secure a playoff spot.

Higher Standard: The wildcard rule forces teams in strong divisions to maintain a higher standard of play throughout the regular season, as they cannot rely on weaker teams in other divisions to pad their records.

Increased Pressure: The wildcard system puts increased pressure on teams in strong divisions to perform well, as they may not have the luxury of a guaranteed playoff spot if they fall behind in the standings.

Wildcard Rule Examples: Memorable Moments in NHL History

Over the years, the NHL wildcard rule has produced some unforgettable moments. One of the most famous examples occurred during the 2010 playoffs when the eighth-seeded Montreal Canadiens defeated the heavily favored first-seeded Washington Capitals. The Canadiens’ goalie, Jaroslav Halak, stood on his head, making an incredible 131 saves in the seven-game series.

In 2014, the wildcard rule created another memorable moment when the Los Angeles Kings, who barely made the playoffs as the Western Conference’s second wildcard team, went on to win the Stanley Cup. They became the first team in NHL history to win the Cup as a wildcard team.

Another wildcard success story was the Nashville Predators in 2017, who advanced to their first-ever Stanley Cup Final as the eighth seed in the Western Conference. Despite ultimately losing the Final to the Pittsburgh Penguins, the Predators’ journey was nothing short of remarkable.

However, the wildcard rule has also led to some controversial moments. In 2019, the Columbus Blue Jackets stunned the heavily favored Tampa Bay Lightning in a first-round sweep. Many fans and analysts questioned the validity of the wildcard system and suggested that the Lightning’s historic regular season was overshadowed by their early playoff exit.

Overall, the NHL wildcard rule has added an extra layer of excitement and unpredictability to the playoffs. It has created some of the most memorable moments in NHL history and has given hope to teams that might not have made the playoffs in a traditional format.

Nashville Predators vs. Chicago Blackhawks (2017)

The 2017 Western Conference First Round series between the Nashville Predators and the Chicago Blackhawks was a classic example of the wildcard system at work. The Predators, who finished as the second wild card, faced the top-seeded Blackhawks, who had the best record in the Western Conference.

The Predators made a statement in Game 1, shutting out the Blackhawks 1-0 on the road. They then swept the series in four games, becoming the first eighth-seeded team to sweep a first-round series since the current playoff format was introduced in 1994.

St. Louis Blues vs. San Jose Sharks (2019)

The St. Louis Blues and San Jose Sharks faced off in the Western Conference Final in 2019, where the Wildcard Rule came into play. The Blues had the worst record among the playoff teams, earning them a Wildcard spot. Meanwhile, the Sharks finished second in the Pacific Division.

In Game 3 of the series, the Sharks were leading 5-4 with less than two minutes left in the game. The Blues appeared to tie the game, but the goal was disallowed due to a hand pass. However, the NHL admitted that the call was missed, and the Sharks went on to score another goal to win the game. This controversial play sparked debate about the impact of the Wildcard Rule on the NHL playoffs.

Colorado Avalanche vs. Minnesota Wild (2021)

Unlikely Playoff Matchup: The Avalanche and Wild had been division rivals for years, but due to the Wildcard Rule, they met in the playoffs for the first time in 18 years.

Game-Winning Goal: In Game 1 of the series, Avalanche defenseman Cale Makar scored the game-winning goal in his playoff debut, becoming the first player in NHL history to score a goal in his first career game in the playoffs while also making his NHL debut in the same postseason.

Series Sweep: The Avalanche went on to sweep the Wild in four games, outscoring them 18-7 in the series. It was the first time the Avalanche had swept a playoff series since the team moved to Colorado in 1995.

Frequently Asked Questions